Monday, January 23, 2012

Is it SOUL or సొల్లు

I saw them saying that the great saints/prophets (rishis) are of great deal... they even say that they are capable of living without food and water for long time enough and are of unchangeable attitude that concerns only the divine eternity the point of view of which they never quote/say straight forward or we can't understand what they understood in their form/notion...


Why is this intrigue, why do they create something called aathma "the soul".... what makes them to think of it. when they are asked for proof of presence of soul they say that you can't get its vision with your natural form, it looks hilarious

the great fact of the nature is that nothing is in the perceivable form of itself unless there is some physical alteration in that system whether you are able to understand it or not... so almost everything happens with a reason.. when there is a reason obviously there is a causative agent for that reason to exist, a causative agent should be in any form but it should be able to interact with the physical form of our Universe, when its capable of interactive with physical form, its certain that its conceivable, comprehensive enough... 
people do dream, dream is a very creative aspect of brain that can make many things come together in a very peculiar way within which combination of some known physical forms could be possible to drive the formation of new object which you understood it as an object that one feels he never come into contact with such thing in his life time... 

So the dream itself which can create immensely different unknown objects and situations need to find the support of physical components of the system, this makes me question about the integrity of the soul precisely its not the integrity of the soul instead you can say on the comprehension how those who said about the existence of it. the question is how they could see the soul, how they understood the soul, when they can't show the soul to someone as they see, why do they need to publish it to the society... why should they make the world of innocents into fools. What is the first physical component of their comprehension is understood the form and properties of the soul and what are they comparable to in the actual world and what is the proof or guarantee that can answer them the integrity of it.

The past society had been run on the footage of these kind of beliefs... king rules society, but he is abide by the situations of the nature and he is afraid to/ abode of the person he supposed to have the knowledge of what nature is and how certain he is about the events and situations of the nature... So whatever beliefs built by such persons within their society were holy-centric which means that the uncertain nature has to be praised (good thing: maintains discipline in society), but the wicked intelligence of this concept creators is that the process of praising needs a ritual which fills stomach of those knowledgeable's community whether the other persons of that community are worthy of it or not. this is just one of the examples,

coming to the soul: if you are well aware of the fact that this is the only life another one previous/next doesn't exist and there is no need for customizations(paapam, punyam) for the best next life or to revive/restrain previous life's odds within this life... you may lead your life like anything and that is dangerous to the ruler and the cunning fox the wicked intelligent fellows those stay beside ruler, the intellect needs the power of the ruler where as ruler needs intellect to empower itself more, that symbiosis is great where as they in their combination become conjoint parasites to the society which is said to be commensulistic in their words. So one needs to worry equally not about their present life but also about previous and next lifes so... probably soul has its origin over here(if no one proves the existence of the soul I say it damn bigger as louder as whole world can listen to it), so what if the soul exists. Its a real big deal, if you are able to make the innocent and ill-educated or uneducated believe things about soul and incarnations/re-incarnations and make them afraid of all oddities caused when things go wrong from them(wrong actually for those who rule/rule the ruler) they simply believe and go on doing it without scrutinizing that, ruler's power makes them mum/silent... A silence of hundred years or more is sufficient make the theme to become into a custom and a follow up system or anything you term...

During my childhood I was also told not to question about anything just for the reason that those who told are elders and so being elders they shouldn't be questioned even for clarifying our doubts about that contemporary event that's taking place there...


I am not writing this for those either who do not believe in the existence of soul or not for those who do not care about whether it exists, but its meant for those argue about existence of souls....
A simple questions... how do you give a proof as an unquestionable answer regarding the existence of soul and eventual stories about it ???


Its just against the concept of existence of the soul but not against the great contributions of the ancient saints...

1 comment: