| They said that, whenever any particle, that includes even light particle hits the Higgs Boson with enormous amount of energy, it generates matter out of nothing and they even predict the same theory for origin of the Universe from or out of nothing... hmmm but how? my question goes this way, if its a physics part, derived from empirical calculation and expected for something such as Higgs Boson, that's fine but why and how can it form something out nothing?, how is it predicted to be possible?, nowhere in the explanation, you are giving an idea of how enormous amount of energy is needed and it is utilized and what's its fate of after the activity of Higgs hit to something such as some electromagnetic radiation. Why don't you predict it as the conversion of energy into matter? what inhibits you to speak that way and why do you say it, as out of nothing when there could be involvement of energy. if it were not from energy how does it generate matter out of nothing. If you say it generates matter from energy how does it do so... If physics says every idea as empirical which is expected to be taken for granted, how does non-physics people accept it. Its your minimum responsibility to explain, what it is all and how and why you are expecting something is taking place, in a comprehensive way to those who can not understand physics... right?, why can Boson only work it out and not any other? Just calculations are not equivalent to science or research, isn't it. then how and why it is so explained the so called way saying Higgs Particle as God particle? |
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
A query to Physicists on HIGGs Boson
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
As they said something from nothing ....i think this can be explained by e=mc2-according to this mass and energy are interchangeable.For example The Sun is a fusion reactor. Every second, billions of tonnes of hydrogen are fused to helium, and mass is converted to energy and vice verse.If it is related to above statement in that case "noting is hydrogen" and something is "Helium".I think my comparison justifies it right!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDelete@Mahesh:
ReplyDeleteHey dude, its cools.. you've responded to my blog post, it is so they can call it as hydrogen as in the case of stars, but they didn't do it so.. and absolute nothing only can be called as dude, there are no side way interpretations in the contemporary world and they're not accepted to be spelled like that too. As you said I too gave an idea saying that it could be forming matter from energy... but energy term is itself is merely theoretical and no practically physical meaning i there for that. ball hitting bat all includes movement with rate of change of time and speed of a particle, ball, body gives rise to energy... so without mass energy is possible only in theory, so its conversion into matter can be understood by only proving that there are connecting links as a cascade in biosystems to make matter.. I hope "meeru naa kavi hrudayaanni ardham chesukunnaarani bhaavisthunnaanu"