....................................Yeah, I too don't like certain thumb-rules, I really wonder why those people always showed their middle finger to these kind of thumb'(s) rules... I believe that historians are too futuristic in their presumption regarding them. They must have thought that the stone made citadels and its insane rules would be persistent. Its general human tendency to foresee the future and its grievances on self, apparently virtually they live in the future too........ Comprehending the spirit of freedom and putting efforts for its accomplishment was the history. It was when they were fringed to have responsibility by enforcement...... Now the case became smart and they are not taking away freedom of someone by squeezing one's strength instead they are doing it by en-cashing the weakness... I do not know what kind of emulations would be aspired and enacted to overcome these kind of uneven and unwanted (for some people) tasks...................................... |
It is true that one would even forget to take food and sleep when they work with science and get amazing results....
|
|
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
thumb rule
Saturday, March 12, 2011
hmm .... a living fossil
I said to him that, "I do like such a state where food is available and we can go and take it, I'm an anti-competentialist and I never believe or like to compete for surveillance, I do not like but I believe in sustenance from competition of my predator on me". Then he said,"So far I thought coelacanths are living fossils, but now I can write a paper that I found another living fossil known with characters homo erectus and even more peculiar" and he also asked,"How could you sustain your mindset like that inspite of several agonies affecting your kind of creatures???". I have no answer for him, I think there is no single organism with human characters could like to be with this mindset. Yes, I too do not understand, why didn't such a mindset got extinction from this insane society. They do always like to sink into their own soup, and never try to understand that the period they are living is not an eternal intimacy with this brutal and malleable and malicious nature that mimics mother for some time and become a demon the next moment, if one is asked to presume his persistence with such a person for long enough, who would dare to be with... but they love this nature and laugh at the persons who realize it. They say, "you should be flexible to be sustaining with nature". why should I, okay if one should be able to be so, by deterioration of the self, its even more possible,flexible and even plausible. The truth is extinction is the fate that is carefully and inevitably decided by nature, but retainment of these fossil characters is just the mistake/overlook of it. |
Saturday, March 05, 2011
musings
In childhood I was there at places where there is continuous rigor went on that was amazing to listen, read and no one spoke negative about life. But the present circles includes where 90% of people speak negative about life. I say negative because they feel sad about those things and any amazing thing is a stupidity for them and Many people say that I speak negative about life despite I say them smiling and they are truths beyond the scope of life the thought of which really makes one to leave the life as soon as possible. My truth is fantasy for many people, they may understand the luster of life just like that only... Truly speaking the basic need of ATP to cell makes a person to live from his origin to senescence and death, despite being aware of the fact that he is for nothing in this world, and being also aware of the fact that he's an ecological output on evolutionary scale, he likes to be the part of the beauty of physical and psychological events and get affected by both planned and random circumstances, which he calls necessity and which I call weakness.. |
Wednesday, March 02, 2011
How Nanorobots Will Work
| Imagine going to the doctor to get treatment for a persistent fever. Instead of giving you a pill or a shot, the doctor refers you to a special medical team which implants a tiny robot into your bloodstream. The robot detects the cause of your fever, travels to the appropriate system and provides a dose of medication directly to the infected area.
Surprisingly, we're not that far off from seeing devices like this actually used in medical procedures. They're called nanorobots and engineering teams around the world are working to design robots that will eventually be used to treat everything from hemophilia to cancer.
As you can imagine, the challenges facing engineers are daunting. A viable nanorobot has to be small and agile enough to navigate through the human circulatory system, an incredibly complex network of veins and arteries. The robot must also have the capacity to carry medication or miniature tools. Assuming the nanorobot isn't meant to stay in the patient forever, it also has to be able to make its way out of the host. In this article, we'll learn about the potential applications of nanorobots, the various ways nanorobots will navigate and move through our bodies, the tools they will use to heal patients, the progress teams around the world have made so far and what theorists see in the future. In the next section, we'll learn about the conditions and diseases nanorobots will treat in the future. Take Two Bots and Call Me in the MorningProperly realized, nanorobots will be able to treat a host of diseases and conditions. While their size means they can only carry very small payloads of medicine or equipment, many doctors and engineers believe the precise application of these tools will be more effective than more traditional methods. For example, a doctor might deliver a powerful antibiotic to a patient through a syringe to help his immune system. The antibiotic becomes diluted while it travels through the patient's bloodstream, causing only some of it makes it to the point of infection. However, a nanorobot -- or team of nanorobots -- could travel to the point of infection directly and deliver a small dose of medication. The patient would potentially suffer fewer side effects from the medication. Several engineers, scientists and doctors believe that nanorobot applications are practically unlimited. Some of the most likely uses include:
In the next section, we'll see how nanorobots will navigate through the circulatory system. Nanorobot NavigationThere are three main considerations scientists need to focus on when looking at nanorobots moving through the body -- navigation, power and how the nanorobot will move through blood vessels. Nanotechnologists are looking at different options for each of these considerations, each of which has positive and negative aspects. Most options can be divided into one of two categories: external systems and onboard systems. External navigation systems might use a variety of different methods to pilot the nanorobot to the right location. One of these methods is to use ultrasonic signals to detect the nanorobot's location and direct it to the right destination. Doctors would beam ultrasonic signals into the patient's body. The signals would either pass through the body, reflect back to the source of the signals, or both. The nanorobot could emit pulses of ultrasonic signals, which doctors could detect using special equipment with ultrasonic sensors. Doctors could keep track of the nanorobot's location and maneuver it to the right part of the patient's body.
Using a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) device, doctors could locate and track a nanorobot by detecting its magnetic field. Doctors and engineers at the Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal demonstrated how they could detect, track, control and even propel a nanorobot using MRI. They tested their findings by maneuvering a small magnetic particle through a pig's arteries using specialized software on an MRI machine. Because many hospitals have MRI machines, this might become the industry standard -- hospitals won't have to invest in expensive, unproven technologies. Doctors might also track nanorobots by injecting a radioactive dye into the patient's bloodstream. They would then use a fluoroscope or similar device to detect the radioactive dye as it moves through the circulatory system. Complex three-dimensional images would indicate where the nanorobot is located. Alternatively, the nanorobot could emit the radioactive dye, creating a pathway behind it as it moves through the body. Other methods of detecting the nanorobot include using X-rays, radio waves, microwaves or heat. Right now, our technology using these methods on nano-sized objects is limited, so it's much more likely that future systems will rely more on other methods. Onboard systems, or internal sensors, might also play a large role in navigation. A nanorobot with chemical sensors could detect and follow the trail of specific chemicals to reach the right location. A spectroscopic sensor would allow the nanorobot to take samples of surrounding tissue, analyze them and follow a path of the right combination of chemicals. Hard as it may be to imagine, nanorobots might include a miniature television camera. An operator at a console will be able to steer the device while watching a live video feed, navigating it through the body manually. Camera systems are fairly complex, so it might be a few years before nanotechnologists can create a reliable system that can fit inside a tiny robot. Powering the NanorobotJust like the navigation systems, nanotechnologists are considering both external and internal power sources. Some designs rely on the nanorobot using the patient's own body as a way of generating power. Other designs include a small power source on board the robot itself. Finally, some designs use forces outside the patient's body to power the robot. Nanorobots could get power directly from the bloodstream. A nanorobot with mounted electrodes could form a battery using the electrolytes found in blood. Another option is to create chemical reactions with blood to burn it for energy. The nanorobot would hold a small supply of chemicals that would become a fuel source when combined with blood. A nanorobot could use the patient's body heat to create power, but there would need to be a gradient of temperatures to manage it. Power generation would be a result of the Seebeck effect. The Seebeck effect occurs when two conductors made of different metals are joined at two points that are kept at two different temperatures. The metal conductors become a thermocouple, meaning that they generate voltage when the junctures are at different temperatures. Since it's difficult to rely on temperature gradients within the body, it's unlikely we'll see many nanorobots use body heat for power. While it might be possible to create batteries small enough to fit inside a nanorobot, they aren't generally seen as a viable power source. The problem is that batteries supply a relatively small amount of power related to their size and weight, so a very small battery would only provide a fraction of the power a nanorobot would need. A more likely candidate is a capacitor, which has a slightly better power-to-weight ratio.
Another possibility for nanorobot power is to use a nuclear power source. The thought of a tiny robot powered by nuclear energy gives some people the willies, but keep in mind the amount of material is small and, according to some experts, easy to shield [source: Rubinstein]. Still, public opinions regarding nuclear power make this possibility unlikely at best. External power sources include systems where the nanorobot is either tethered to the outside world or is controlled without a physical tether. Tethered systems would need a wire between the nanorobot and the power source. The wire would need to be strong, but it would also need to move effortlessly through the human body without causing damage. A physical tether could supply power either by electricity or optically. Optical systems use light through fiber optics, which would then need to be converted into electricity on board the robot.
External systems that don't use tethers could rely on microwaves, ultrasonic signals or magnetic fields. Microwaves are the least likely, since beaming them into a patient would result in damaged tissue, since the patient's body would absorb most of the microwaves and heat up as a result. A nanorobot with a piezoelectric membrane could pick up ultrasonic signals and convert them into electricity. Systems using magnetic fields, like the one doctors are experimenting with in Montreal, can either manipulate the nanorobot directly or induce an electrical current in a closed conducting loop in the robot. Nanorobot LocomotionAssuming the nanorobot isn't tethered or designed to float passively through the bloodstream, it will need a means of propulsion to get around the body. Because it may have to travel against the flow of blood, the propulsion system has to be relatively strong for its size. Another important consideration is the safety of the patient -- the system must be able to move the nanorobot around without causing damage to the host.Some scientists are looking at the world of microscopic organisms for inspiration. Paramecium move through their environment using tiny tail-like limbs called cilia. By vibrating the cilia, the paramecium can swim in any direction. Similar to cilia are flagella, which are longer tail structures. Organisms whip flagella around in different ways to move around.
Another potential way nanorobots could move around is by using a vibrating membrane. By alternately tightening and relaxing tension on a membrane, a nanorobot could generate small amounts of thrust. On the nanoscale, this thrust could be significant enough to act as a viable source of motion. In the next section, we'll look at the tools nanorobots might carry to fulfill their medical missions. Teeny, Tiny Tools
Nanorobots: Today and TomorrowTeams around the world are working on creating the first practical medical nanorobot. Robots ranging from a millimeter in diameter to a relatively hefty two centimeters long already exist, though they are all still in the testing phase of development and haven't been used on people. We're probably several years away from seeing nanorobots enter the medical market. Today's microrobots are just prototypes that lack the ability to perform medical tasks.
Will we one day have thousands of microscopic robots rushing around in our veins, making corrections and healing our cuts, bruises and illnesses? With nanotechnology, it seems like anything is possible. Original article reference: http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/nanorobot.htm |
Friday, February 25, 2011
Few thoughts and predictions
I believe that, ethics and some other such social elements can not be found in and as some benchmark phenotypes in the thread of evolution as they are just induced phenomena of social behavior with variable intensity in their dissipation and reception too, the marks of which can't be imbibed into genes that easily, but I'm not sure. nature may prove me wrong... yet above statement is certain at least for few centuries and I do also believe that, natural evolution may reduce significance in influencing at least the human population's changes which are actually supposed to be brought about by just natural means, but the advent of artificial intelligence and other technologies may make humans to be rudimentary in many issues in future and the evolution may be influenced significantly by artificial intelligence in collaboration with ecology. There could be mixed nature in human body content which may get relatively large part of change in its composition by means addition more metals as circuits, fiber content and so on. There were some calculations regarding the content of pollutants of the contemporary world and time taken for their vanishing if they are left un-produced, but there is a chance for evolution of pollution resistant verity of humans. But I have another doubt also that, the sophistication of technology may more slows down the evolutionary mechanisms, in certain group of individuals being enslaved by technology. hmmm many more thoughts and dreams next time.. Cheers :) |
Monday, January 31, 2011
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Friday, January 28, 2011
Friday, January 21, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



